Skip to Content
Main content

KINGS PARK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 619

LEVEL 1

71

11%

LEVEL 2

174

28%

LEVEL 3

238

38%

LEVEL 4

136

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

66

12%

LEVEL 2

189

34%

LEVEL 3

198

35%

LEVEL 4

106

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

115

38%

LEVEL 4

89

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

108

39%

LEVEL 4

73

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

170
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

123

39%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

17

55%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

317
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

154

29%

LEVEL 3

198

37%

LEVEL 4

119

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

256
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

162

34%

LEVEL 3

168

36%

LEVEL 4

88

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

368
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

144

27%

LEVEL 3

233

43%

LEVEL 4

135

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

191

40%

LEVEL 4

105

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

41

53%

LEVEL 2

30

39%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

45

55%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

339
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

154

28%

LEVEL 3

216

39%

LEVEL 4

123

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

162

33%

LEVEL 3

179

37%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

22

33%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.