WILLIAM PACA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

154

49%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

134

43%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

57

40%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

51

37%

LEVEL 2

59

42%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

97

57%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

83

49%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

68

45%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

51

40%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

39

65%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

37

49%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

40

45%

LEVEL 2

33

37%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

105

41%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

91

35%

LEVEL 2

110

42%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

49

89%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

43

86%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

60
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

124

42%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

31

31%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

39

32%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

123

58%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

95

51%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.