Skip to Content
Main content

SENECA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

79

43%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

117

44%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

37

39%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

42

47%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

44

32%

LEVEL 2

62

45%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

62

45%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

42

23%

LEVEL 2

82

45%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

14

47%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

71

45%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

107

48%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

30

71%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

65

45%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

44

22%

LEVEL 2

89

44%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

13

34%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

26

41%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.