HORNELL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

271

39%

LEVEL 2

268

38%

LEVEL 3

126

18%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

281

40%

LEVEL 2

266

38%

LEVEL 3

112

16%

LEVEL 4

35

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

103

30%

LEVEL 2

144

42%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

102

30%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

168

48%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

179

50%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

235

38%

LEVEL 2

238

39%

LEVEL 3

113

18%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 619

LEVEL 1

250

40%

LEVEL 2

237

38%

LEVEL 3

99

16%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

173

29%

LEVEL 2

261

44%

LEVEL 3

125

21%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

183

32%

LEVEL 2

247

43%

LEVEL 3

111

19%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

98

92%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

98

83%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

90

40%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

92

42%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

226

48%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

59

12%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

233

49%

LEVEL 2

174

37%

LEVEL 3

56

12%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.