HORNELL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

128

38%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

140

39%

LEVEL 2

134

38%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

80

48%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

88

50%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

112

37%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

55

18%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

127

40%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

76

27%

LEVEL 2

124

45%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

124

42%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

52

91%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

49

83%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

45

43%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

105

46%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

121

48%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.