Skip to Content
Main content

CAMPBELL-SAVONA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

146

42%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

78

44%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

90

25%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

144

43%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

124

42%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

41

67%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

65

31%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

42

21%

LEVEL 2

92

46%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.