WATERLOO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

106

29%

LEVEL 2

150

41%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

132

32%

LEVEL 2

160

39%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

85

43%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

91

39%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

88

27%

LEVEL 2

131

40%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

114

30%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

141

45%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

147

42%

LEVEL 3

91

26%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

44

83%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

51

78%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

95

36%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.