Skip to Content
Main content

SCHALMONT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

156

27%

LEVEL 2

236

40%

LEVEL 3

142

24%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

160

27%

LEVEL 2

214

36%

LEVEL 3

172

29%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

91

34%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

134

26%

LEVEL 2

207

41%

LEVEL 3

125

25%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

136

27%

LEVEL 2

181

36%

LEVEL 3

151

30%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

104

20%

LEVEL 2

230

44%

LEVEL 3

140

27%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

116

22%

LEVEL 2

201

38%

LEVEL 3

171

32%

LEVEL 4

45

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

52

87%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

44

75%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

89

20%

LEVEL 2

178

41%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

91

21%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

67

46%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

69

42%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.