Skip to Content
Main content

SCOTIA-GLENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

178

25%

LEVEL 2

229

33%

LEVEL 3

197

28%

LEVEL 4

100

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 802

LEVEL 1

183

23%

LEVEL 2

276

34%

LEVEL 3

224

28%

LEVEL 4

119

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

66

18%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

77

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

117

27%

LEVEL 2

167

38%

LEVEL 3

108

25%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

278
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

162

25%

LEVEL 2

211

32%

LEVEL 3

185

28%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

318
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

162

22%

LEVEL 2

256

35%

LEVEL 3

205

28%

LEVEL 4

113

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

111

18%

LEVEL 2

212

35%

LEVEL 3

192

31%

LEVEL 4

99

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

118

17%

LEVEL 2

250

36%

LEVEL 3

218

31%

LEVEL 4

118

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

67

74%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

65

66%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

91

18%

LEVEL 2

162

32%

LEVEL 3

162

32%

LEVEL 4

85

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

299
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

95

16%

LEVEL 2

192

33%

LEVEL 3

188

32%

LEVEL 4

111

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

87

43%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

88

41%

LEVEL 2

84

39%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.