Skip to Content
Main content

FRANCIS L STEVENS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

66

37%

LEVEL 4

52

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

74

37%

LEVEL 4

55

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

39

42%

LEVEL 4

31

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

45

41%

LEVEL 4

33

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

21

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

50

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

6

86%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

66

40%

LEVEL 4

52

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

72

41%

LEVEL 4

55

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

56

38%

LEVEL 4

47

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

52

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

15

42%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.