Skip to Content
Main content

A A KINGSTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

77

23%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

26

76%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

23

79%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

52

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

47

43%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

44

38%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.