BRASHER FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

117

33%

LEVEL 2

132

37%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

136

35%

LEVEL 2

141

36%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

81

43%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

87

43%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

108

33%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

127

35%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

128

41%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

90

28%

LEVEL 2

127

39%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

39

87%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

46

73%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

93

45%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

102

45%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.