Skip to Content
Main content

SCHODACK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

69

22%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

106

34%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

122

37%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

57

39%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

28

70%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

23

53%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

90

35%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

27

36%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

20

28%

LEVEL 2

26

36%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.