HOOSICK FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

143

34%

LEVEL 2

146

35%

LEVEL 3

106

25%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

116

28%

LEVEL 2

163

40%

LEVEL 3

99

24%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

92

45%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

77

39%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

130

33%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

104

28%

LEVEL 2

151

40%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

102

28%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

95

26%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

41

82%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

29

60%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

93

44%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

82

39%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.