Skip to Content
Main content

HOWARD L GOFF SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

102

14%

LEVEL 2

207

29%

LEVEL 3

254

36%

LEVEL 4

144

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

425
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

81

11%

LEVEL 2

212

30%

LEVEL 3

232

32%

LEVEL 4

193

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

226
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

141

39%

LEVEL 4

85

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

228
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

107

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

197
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

86

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

16

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

19

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

328
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

76

13%

LEVEL 2

169

29%

LEVEL 3

218

38%

LEVEL 4

110

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

347
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

60

10%

LEVEL 2

172

30%

LEVEL 3

197

34%

LEVEL 4

150

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

388
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

183

30%

LEVEL 3

246

40%

LEVEL 4

142

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

413
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

182

29%

LEVEL 3

221

35%

LEVEL 4

192

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

60

64%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

46

52%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

350
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

55

10%

LEVEL 2

160

28%

LEVEL 3

216

38%

LEVEL 4

134

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

376
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

152

27%

LEVEL 3

199

35%

LEVEL 4

177

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

47

33%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.