Skip to Content
Main content

MEXICO MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

132

38%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

131

42%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

58

39%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

78

46%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

73

44%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

128

39%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

125

42%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

86

30%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

86

33%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

46

77%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

45

80%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

100

51%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

104

57%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.