ANNA S KUHL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

147

41%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

157

41%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

61

37%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

72

35%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

86

45%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

85

48%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

89

39%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

25

52%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

24

44%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

29

39%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

118

36%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

53

82%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

39

76%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

31

29%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

124

50%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

125

48%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.