Skip to Content
Main content

C S DRIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

162

30%

LEVEL 3

209

39%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

63

12%

LEVEL 2

197

37%

LEVEL 3

174

33%

LEVEL 4

96

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

64

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

64

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

114

40%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

114

41%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

88%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

287
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

74

14%

LEVEL 2

160

31%

LEVEL 3

198

38%

LEVEL 4

89

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

258
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

61

12%

LEVEL 2

189

37%

LEVEL 3

167

33%

LEVEL 4

91

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

150

30%

LEVEL 3

202

41%

LEVEL 4

90

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

183

38%

LEVEL 3

168

35%

LEVEL 4

95

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

25

54%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

264
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

179

40%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

140

34%

LEVEL 3

138

34%

LEVEL 4

89

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

57

48%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.