Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH SYRACUSE JUNIOR HS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

138

43%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

118

32%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

49

33%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

89

51%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

81

42%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

114

42%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

96

31%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

106

37%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

91

27%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

32

84%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

27

68%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

66

34%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

72

57%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

57

44%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.