Skip to Content
Main content

CAMDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

105

48%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

82

37%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

32

36%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

73

56%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

57

45%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

100

48%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

78

37%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

83%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

59

35%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

77

43%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

46

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

35

85%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

24

35%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

37

42%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

81

54%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

61

47%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.