Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #31 - STATEN ISLAND GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,385
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,002

LEVEL 1

5,713

22%

LEVEL 2

8,904

34%

LEVEL 3

7,624

29%

LEVEL 4

3,761

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,099
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,008

LEVEL 1

5,363

21%

LEVEL 2

8,546

33%

LEVEL 3

7,639

29%

LEVEL 4

4,460

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,421
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,607

LEVEL 1

2,050

16%

LEVEL 2

4,136

33%

LEVEL 3

4,104

33%

LEVEL 4

2,317

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,759
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,636

LEVEL 1

1,910

15%

LEVEL 2

3,967

31%

LEVEL 3

4,054

32%

LEVEL 4

2,705

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,964
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,395

LEVEL 1

3,663

27%

LEVEL 2

4,768

36%

LEVEL 3

3,520

26%

LEVEL 4

1,444

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,340
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,372

LEVEL 1

3,453

26%

LEVEL 2

4,579

34%

LEVEL 3

3,585

27%

LEVEL 4

1,755

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

117
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

160
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

68

21%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

45
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

42

38%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

49
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

41

34%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,359
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,094

LEVEL 1

183

9%

LEVEL 2

552

26%

LEVEL 3

796

38%

LEVEL 4

563

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,465
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,246

LEVEL 1

224

10%

LEVEL 2

557

25%

LEVEL 3

764

34%

LEVEL 4

701

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,974
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,066

LEVEL 1

1,836

14%

LEVEL 2

4,256

33%

LEVEL 3

4,509

35%

LEVEL 4

2,465

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7,104
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,637

LEVEL 1

1,599

13%

LEVEL 2

3,934

31%

LEVEL 3

4,352

34%

LEVEL 4

2,752

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

775
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,364

LEVEL 1

1,351

40%

LEVEL 2

1,238

37%

LEVEL 3

587

17%

LEVEL 4

188

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

902
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,386

LEVEL 1

1,299

38%

LEVEL 2

1,185

35%

LEVEL 3

663

20%

LEVEL 4

239

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,115
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,104

LEVEL 1

2,259

32%

LEVEL 2

2,730

38%

LEVEL 3

1,626

23%

LEVEL 4

489

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,419
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,295

LEVEL 1

2,132

29%

LEVEL 2

2,744

38%

LEVEL 3

1,727

24%

LEVEL 4

692

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,541
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,925

LEVEL 1

1,950

10%

LEVEL 2

6,434

34%

LEVEL 3

6,895

36%

LEVEL 4

3,646

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,200
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,096

LEVEL 1

1,870

10%

LEVEL 2

6,026

32%

LEVEL 3

6,878

36%

LEVEL 4

4,322

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

844
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,077

LEVEL 1

3,763

53%

LEVEL 2

2,470

35%

LEVEL 3

729

10%

LEVEL 4

115

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

899
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,912

LEVEL 1

3,493

51%

LEVEL 2

2,520

36%

LEVEL 3

761

11%

LEVEL 4

138

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11,343
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,794

LEVEL 1

4,879

20%

LEVEL 2

8,572

35%

LEVEL 3

7,584

31%

LEVEL 4

3,759

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12,013
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,646

LEVEL 1

4,501

18%

LEVEL 2

8,132

33%

LEVEL 3

7,557

31%

LEVEL 4

4,456

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,208

LEVEL 1

834

69%

LEVEL 2

332

27%

LEVEL 3

40

3%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

86
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,362

LEVEL 1

862

63%

LEVEL 2

414

30%

LEVEL 3

82

6%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,621
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,346

LEVEL 1

1,366

12%

LEVEL 2

3,359

30%

LEVEL 3

4,132

36%

LEVEL 4

2,489

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,807
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,268

LEVEL 1

1,240

11%

LEVEL 2

3,221

29%

LEVEL 3

3,926

35%

LEVEL 4

2,881

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,764
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,656

LEVEL 1

4,347

30%

LEVEL 2

5,545

38%

LEVEL 3

3,492

24%

LEVEL 4

1,272

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,292
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,740

LEVEL 1

4,123

28%

LEVEL 2

5,325

36%

LEVEL 3

3,713

25%

LEVEL 4

1,579

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.