Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #30 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,073
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,322

LEVEL 1

3,883

21%

LEVEL 2

6,366

35%

LEVEL 3

5,137

28%

LEVEL 4

2,936

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,718
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,330

LEVEL 1

3,611

20%

LEVEL 2

6,001

33%

LEVEL 3

5,243

29%

LEVEL 4

3,475

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,499
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,065

LEVEL 1

1,465

16%

LEVEL 2

3,101

34%

LEVEL 3

2,734

30%

LEVEL 4

1,765

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,863
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,050

LEVEL 1

1,351

15%

LEVEL 2

2,836

31%

LEVEL 3

2,791

31%

LEVEL 4

2,072

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,574
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,257

LEVEL 1

2,418

26%

LEVEL 2

3,265

35%

LEVEL 3

2,403

26%

LEVEL 4

1,171

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,855
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,280

LEVEL 1

2,260

24%

LEVEL 2

3,165

34%

LEVEL 3

2,452

26%

LEVEL 4

1,403

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

89
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

48

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

135
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

84

47%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

36
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

19

21%

LEVEL 2

34

38%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

47
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,607
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,128

LEVEL 1

453

11%

LEVEL 2

1,068

26%

LEVEL 3

1,407

34%

LEVEL 4

1,200

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,694
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,096

LEVEL 1

403

10%

LEVEL 2

999

24%

LEVEL 3

1,344

33%

LEVEL 4

1,350

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,553
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,634

LEVEL 1

318

12%

LEVEL 2

763

29%

LEVEL 3

861

33%

LEVEL 4

692

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,714
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,701

LEVEL 1

312

12%

LEVEL 2

675

25%

LEVEL 3

881

33%

LEVEL 4

833

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

327
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,157

LEVEL 1

426

37%

LEVEL 2

404

35%

LEVEL 3

258

22%

LEVEL 4

69

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

340
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,178

LEVEL 1

439

37%

LEVEL 2

399

34%

LEVEL 3

243

21%

LEVEL 4

97

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,461
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,188

LEVEL 1

2,658

26%

LEVEL 2

4,069

40%

LEVEL 3

2,545

25%

LEVEL 4

916

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,788
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,085

LEVEL 1

2,427

24%

LEVEL 2

3,870

38%

LEVEL 3

2,694

27%

LEVEL 4

1,094

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,825
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,326

LEVEL 1

2,123

14%

LEVEL 2

5,378

35%

LEVEL 3

4,920

32%

LEVEL 4

2,905

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,437
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,402

LEVEL 1

1,962

13%

LEVEL 2

5,003

32%

LEVEL 3

4,998

32%

LEVEL 4

3,439

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

248
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,996

LEVEL 1

1,760

59%

LEVEL 2

988

33%

LEVEL 3

217

7%

LEVEL 4

31

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

281
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,928

LEVEL 1

1,649

56%

LEVEL 2

998

34%

LEVEL 3

245

8%

LEVEL 4

36

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,974
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,900

LEVEL 1

2,328

15%

LEVEL 2

5,598

35%

LEVEL 3

5,048

32%

LEVEL 4

2,926

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,576
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,817

LEVEL 1

2,083

13%

LEVEL 2

5,158

33%

LEVEL 3

5,112

32%

LEVEL 4

3,464

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

99
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,422

LEVEL 1

1,555

64%

LEVEL 2

768

32%

LEVEL 3

89

4%

LEVEL 4

10

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

142
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,513

LEVEL 1

1,528

61%

LEVEL 2

843

34%

LEVEL 3

131

5%

LEVEL 4

11

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,026
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,462

LEVEL 1

817

15%

LEVEL 2

1,619

30%

LEVEL 3

1,711

31%

LEVEL 4

1,315

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,464
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,879

LEVEL 1

850

14%

LEVEL 2

1,565

27%

LEVEL 3

1,821

31%

LEVEL 4

1,643

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,047
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,860

LEVEL 1

3,066

24%

LEVEL 2

4,747

37%

LEVEL 3

3,426

27%

LEVEL 4

1,621

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,254
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,451

LEVEL 1

2,761

22%

LEVEL 2

4,436

36%

LEVEL 3

3,422

27%

LEVEL 4

1,832

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.