Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #27 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,983
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,387

LEVEL 1

5,355

25%

LEVEL 2

8,049

38%

LEVEL 3

5,499

26%

LEVEL 4

2,484

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,257
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,359

LEVEL 1

5,455

26%

LEVEL 2

7,647

36%

LEVEL 3

5,543

26%

LEVEL 4

2,714

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,574
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,375

LEVEL 1

2,030

20%

LEVEL 2

3,771

36%

LEVEL 3

3,044

29%

LEVEL 4

1,530

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,711
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,360

LEVEL 1

2,006

19%

LEVEL 2

3,643

35%

LEVEL 3

3,014

29%

LEVEL 4

1,697

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,409
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,012

LEVEL 1

3,325

30%

LEVEL 2

4,278

39%

LEVEL 3

2,455

22%

LEVEL 4

954

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,546
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,999

LEVEL 1

3,449

31%

LEVEL 2

4,004

36%

LEVEL 3

2,529

23%

LEVEL 4

1,017

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

45
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

35

40%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

265
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 794

LEVEL 1

207

26%

LEVEL 2

322

41%

LEVEL 3

181

23%

LEVEL 4

84

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

336
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 901

LEVEL 1

231

26%

LEVEL 2

334

37%

LEVEL 3

237

26%

LEVEL 4

99

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,644
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,195

LEVEL 1

775

15%

LEVEL 2

1,776

34%

LEVEL 3

1,662

32%

LEVEL 4

982

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,797
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,243

LEVEL 1

767

15%

LEVEL 2

1,679

32%

LEVEL 3

1,689

32%

LEVEL 4

1,108

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,250
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,327

LEVEL 1

385

17%

LEVEL 2

692

30%

LEVEL 3

746

32%

LEVEL 4

504

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,204
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,236

LEVEL 1

350

16%

LEVEL 2

682

31%

LEVEL 3

707

32%

LEVEL 4

497

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,301
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,222

LEVEL 1

1,818

35%

LEVEL 2

2,103

40%

LEVEL 3

1,004

19%

LEVEL 4

297

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,277
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,916

LEVEL 1

1,789

36%

LEVEL 2

1,850

38%

LEVEL 3

957

19%

LEVEL 4

320

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,478
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,762

LEVEL 1

2,154

28%

LEVEL 2

3,130

40%

LEVEL 3

1,871

24%

LEVEL 4

607

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,590
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,944

LEVEL 1

2,294

29%

LEVEL 2

3,060

39%

LEVEL 3

1,921

24%

LEVEL 4

669

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,580
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,961

LEVEL 1

2,708

16%

LEVEL 2

6,673

39%

LEVEL 3

5,153

30%

LEVEL 4

2,427

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,840
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,982

LEVEL 1

2,887

17%

LEVEL 2

6,255

37%

LEVEL 3

5,185

31%

LEVEL 4

2,655

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

403
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,426

LEVEL 1

2,647

60%

LEVEL 2

1,376

31%

LEVEL 3

346

8%

LEVEL 4

57

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

417
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,377

LEVEL 1

2,568

59%

LEVEL 2

1,392

32%

LEVEL 3

358

8%

LEVEL 4

59

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,934
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,983

LEVEL 1

4,367

22%

LEVEL 2

7,682

38%

LEVEL 3

5,453

27%

LEVEL 4

2,481

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,178
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,749

LEVEL 1

4,422

22%

LEVEL 2

7,149

36%

LEVEL 3

5,468

28%

LEVEL 4

2,710

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,404

LEVEL 1

988

70%

LEVEL 2

367

26%

LEVEL 3

46

3%

LEVEL 4

3

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

79
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,610

LEVEL 1

1,033

64%

LEVEL 2

498

31%

LEVEL 3

75

5%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,433
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,092

LEVEL 1

986

19%

LEVEL 2

1,673

33%

LEVEL 3

1,508

30%

LEVEL 4

925

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,602
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,258

LEVEL 1

977

19%

LEVEL 2

1,679

32%

LEVEL 3

1,586

30%

LEVEL 4

1,016

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,550
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,295

LEVEL 1

4,369

27%

LEVEL 2

6,376

39%

LEVEL 3

3,991

24%

LEVEL 4

1,559

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,655
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,101

LEVEL 1

4,478

28%

LEVEL 2

5,968

37%

LEVEL 3

3,957

25%

LEVEL 4

1,698

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.