MS 53 BRIAN PICCOLO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

141

47%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

135

47%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

45

37%

LEVEL 2

58

48%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

48

42%

LEVEL 2

49

43%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

96

54%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

87

49%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

82

43%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

74

45%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

57

54%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

58

50%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

90

50%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

66

35%

LEVEL 2

80

43%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

86

72%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

69

67%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

112

42%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

46
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

107

42%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

29

83%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

28

74%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

43

51%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

39

51%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

98

45%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

96

45%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.