Skip to Content
Main content

GREGORY JOCKO JACKSON-SPORTS-ARTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

190

55%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

139

46%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

70

42%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

59

42%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

120

67%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

89

55%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

132

55%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

92

44%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

115

45%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

75

34%

LEVEL 2

102

46%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

75

82%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

64

77%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

161

51%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

116

41%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

29

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

21

91%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

172

54%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.