Skip to Content
Main content

PS 206 JOSEPH F LAMB GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

477
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 844

LEVEL 1

105

12%

LEVEL 2

262

31%

LEVEL 3

298

35%

LEVEL 4

179

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

467
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 883

LEVEL 1

137

16%

LEVEL 2

279

32%

LEVEL 3

274

31%

LEVEL 4

193

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

272
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

154

38%

LEVEL 4

118

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

259
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

143

33%

LEVEL 4

116

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

205
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

164

37%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

208
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

93

21%

LEVEL 2

149

33%

LEVEL 3

131

29%

LEVEL 4

77

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

246
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

114

28%

LEVEL 3

153

38%

LEVEL 4

93

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

253
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

109

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

53

15%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

75

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

13

19%

LEVEL 2

40

58%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

30

42%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

462
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 732

LEVEL 1

62

8%

LEVEL 2

208

28%

LEVEL 3

285

39%

LEVEL 4

177

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

92

12%

LEVEL 2

235

30%

LEVEL 3

261

34%

LEVEL 4

190

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

43

38%

LEVEL 2

54

48%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

45

43%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

470
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 752

LEVEL 1

57

8%

LEVEL 2

225

30%

LEVEL 3

292

39%

LEVEL 4

178

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

456
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 763

LEVEL 1

66

9%

LEVEL 2

241

32%

LEVEL 3

264

35%

LEVEL 4

192

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

48

52%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

71

59%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

86

40%

LEVEL 4

63

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

74

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

328
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

96

15%

LEVEL 2

203

32%

LEVEL 3

212

34%

LEVEL 4

116

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

320
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

125

19%

LEVEL 2

225

34%

LEVEL 3

201

30%

LEVEL 4

119

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.