Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #20 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,980
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,543

LEVEL 1

4,478

20%

LEVEL 2

7,085

31%

LEVEL 3

6,766

30%

LEVEL 4

4,214

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,712
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,108

LEVEL 1

4,464

19%

LEVEL 2

6,932

30%

LEVEL 3

6,882

30%

LEVEL 4

4,830

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,821
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,975

LEVEL 1

1,757

16%

LEVEL 2

3,397

31%

LEVEL 3

3,421

31%

LEVEL 4

2,400

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,275
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,180

LEVEL 1

1,712

15%

LEVEL 2

3,193

29%

LEVEL 3

3,488

31%

LEVEL 4

2,787

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,159
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,568

LEVEL 1

2,721

24%

LEVEL 2

3,688

32%

LEVEL 3

3,345

29%

LEVEL 4

1,814

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,437
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,928

LEVEL 1

2,752

23%

LEVEL 2

3,739

31%

LEVEL 3

3,394

28%

LEVEL 4

2,043

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

54
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

26

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

73
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

35

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

15
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

13

26%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5,829
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,472

LEVEL 1

1,752

17%

LEVEL 2

2,891

28%

LEVEL 3

3,385

32%

LEVEL 4

2,444

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6,358
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,944

LEVEL 1

1,732

16%

LEVEL 2

2,854

26%

LEVEL 3

3,521

32%

LEVEL 4

2,837

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3,242
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,989

LEVEL 1

952

16%

LEVEL 2

1,795

30%

LEVEL 3

1,968

33%

LEVEL 4

1,274

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3,265
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,921

LEVEL 1

947

16%

LEVEL 2

1,709

29%

LEVEL 3

1,832

31%

LEVEL 4

1,433

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

191
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

71

15%

LEVEL 2

226

46%

LEVEL 3

140

29%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

210
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

65

14%

LEVEL 2

205

43%

LEVEL 3

151

31%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,650
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,465

LEVEL 1

1,683

31%

LEVEL 2

2,132

39%

LEVEL 3

1,235

23%

LEVEL 4

415

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,791
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,601

LEVEL 1

1,691

30%

LEVEL 2

2,119

38%

LEVEL 3

1,328

24%

LEVEL 4

463

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,568
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,247

LEVEL 1

2,675

14%

LEVEL 2

6,004

31%

LEVEL 3

6,423

33%

LEVEL 4

4,145

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,303
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,862

LEVEL 1

2,708

14%

LEVEL 2

5,851

29%

LEVEL 3

6,554

33%

LEVEL 4

4,749

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

412
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,296

LEVEL 1

1,803

55%

LEVEL 2

1,081

33%

LEVEL 3

343

10%

LEVEL 4

69

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

409
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,246

LEVEL 1

1,756

54%

LEVEL 2

1,081

33%

LEVEL 3

328

10%

LEVEL 4

81

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,689
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,646

LEVEL 1

2,033

11%

LEVEL 2

5,924

32%

LEVEL 3

6,496

35%

LEVEL 4

4,193

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11,394
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,777

LEVEL 1

1,828

10%

LEVEL 2

5,555

30%

LEVEL 3

6,586

35%

LEVEL 4

4,808

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

291
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,897

LEVEL 1

2,445

63%

LEVEL 2

1,161

30%

LEVEL 3

270

7%

LEVEL 4

21

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

318
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,331

LEVEL 1

2,636

61%

LEVEL 2

1,377

32%

LEVEL 3

296

7%

LEVEL 4

22

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,610
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,941

LEVEL 1

845

14%

LEVEL 2

1,486

25%

LEVEL 3

1,981

33%

LEVEL 4

1,629

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,903
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,261

LEVEL 1

812

13%

LEVEL 2

1,546

25%

LEVEL 3

2,067

33%

LEVEL 4

1,836

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,370
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,602

LEVEL 1

3,633

22%

LEVEL 2

5,599

34%

LEVEL 3

4,785

29%

LEVEL 4

2,585

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,809
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,847

LEVEL 1

3,652

22%

LEVEL 2

5,386

32%

LEVEL 3

4,815

29%

LEVEL 4

2,994

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.