PS 127 MCKINLEY PARK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

35

31%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

52

38%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

45

38%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

19

39%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

12

17%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

28

41%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

56

41%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

45

39%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

16

27%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

83

42%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

78

40%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

22

40%

LEVEL 2

22

40%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

21

44%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

125
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

91

41%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

120
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

83

41%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

22

71%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

22

39%

LEVEL 4

19

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

17

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.