Skip to Content
Main content

PS 11 PURVIS J BEHAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

131

38%

LEVEL 4

124

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

61

16%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

173

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

76

42%

LEVEL 4

68

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

32

16%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

98

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

56

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

75

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

12

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

21

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

20

77%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

171
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

99

40%

LEVEL 4

72

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

204
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

115

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

17

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

20

50%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

57

18%

LEVEL 3

128

41%

LEVEL 4

118

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

169

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

18

55%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

75

41%

LEVEL 4

81

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

111

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

62

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.