PS 35 FRANZ SIEGEL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

117

34%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

132

39%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

37

23%

LEVEL 2

66

41%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

56

33%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

80

45%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

76

45%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

36

37%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

32

36%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

96

41%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

56

21%

LEVEL 2

112

43%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

78

30%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

61

79%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

54

74%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

95
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

116

43%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

81
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

73

28%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

57

83%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

59

79%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

109

34%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

129

39%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.