Skip to Content
Main content

HAROLD O LEVY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

142

37%

LEVEL 2

163

43%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

106

38%

LEVEL 2

114

41%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

81

46%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

90

44%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

66

45%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

134

38%

LEVEL 2

154

44%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

100

38%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

109

34%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

98

42%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

33

54%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

28

61%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

149

56%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

87

50%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

99

87%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

78

73%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

14

36%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

133

38%

LEVEL 2

148

42%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

92

38%

LEVEL 2

99

41%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.