Skip to Content
Main content

MS 255 SALK SCHOOL OF SCIENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

33

9%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

224

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

361
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

21

5%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

295

76%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

217
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

161

71%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

188

83%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

63

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

107

67%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

16

73%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

31
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

28

90%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

64
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

49

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

61

85%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

10%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

133

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

174

75%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

8

89%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

18

53%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

24

59%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

4%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

206

65%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

281

85%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

18

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

14

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

303
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

25

8%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

203

62%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

324
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

5%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

266

77%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

21

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

29

69%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.