Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST # 2 - MANHATTAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,012
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,067

LEVEL 1

1,562

10%

LEVEL 2

3,493

23%

LEVEL 3

5,523

37%

LEVEL 4

4,489

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,543
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,175

LEVEL 1

1,370

9%

LEVEL 2

3,262

21%

LEVEL 3

5,239

35%

LEVEL 4

5,304

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,297
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,340

LEVEL 1

548

7%

LEVEL 2

1,495

20%

LEVEL 3

2,669

36%

LEVEL 4

2,628

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,534
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,401

LEVEL 1

477

6%

LEVEL 2

1,390

19%

LEVEL 3

2,406

33%

LEVEL 4

3,128

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,715
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,727

LEVEL 1

1,014

13%

LEVEL 2

1,998

26%

LEVEL 3

2,854

37%

LEVEL 4

1,861

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,009
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,774

LEVEL 1

893

11%

LEVEL 2

1,872

24%

LEVEL 3

2,833

36%

LEVEL 4

2,176

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

467
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

29

5%

LEVEL 2

85

15%

LEVEL 3

214

37%

LEVEL 4

253

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

576
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

19

3%

LEVEL 2

101

15%

LEVEL 3

239

34%

LEVEL 4

337

48%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

67
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

52
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

26

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,218
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,714

LEVEL 1

416

9%

LEVEL 2

1,080

23%

LEVEL 3

1,795

38%

LEVEL 4

1,423

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,335
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,661

LEVEL 1

352

8%

LEVEL 2

974

21%

LEVEL 3

1,640

35%

LEVEL 4

1,695

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4,714
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,007

LEVEL 1

278

5%

LEVEL 2

1,015

17%

LEVEL 3

2,409

40%

LEVEL 4

2,305

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4,981
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,186

LEVEL 1

217

4%

LEVEL 2

988

16%

LEVEL 3

2,352

38%

LEVEL 4

2,629

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

415
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,141

LEVEL 1

303

27%

LEVEL 2

423

37%

LEVEL 3

312

27%

LEVEL 4

103

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

412
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,076

LEVEL 1

280

26%

LEVEL 2

384

36%

LEVEL 3

261

24%

LEVEL 4

151

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,131
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,485

LEVEL 1

503

20%

LEVEL 2

851

34%

LEVEL 3

751

30%

LEVEL 4

380

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,187
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,465

LEVEL 1

486

20%

LEVEL 2

792

32%

LEVEL 3

721

29%

LEVEL 4

466

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,173
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,223

LEVEL 1

594

5%

LEVEL 2

2,456

20%

LEVEL 3

4,922

40%

LEVEL 4

4,251

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,645
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,449

LEVEL 1

531

4%

LEVEL 2

2,273

18%

LEVEL 3

4,570

37%

LEVEL 4

5,075

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

839
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,844

LEVEL 1

968

34%

LEVEL 2

1,037

36%

LEVEL 3

601

21%

LEVEL 4

238

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

898
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,726

LEVEL 1

839

31%

LEVEL 2

989

36%

LEVEL 3

669

25%

LEVEL 4

229

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9,919
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,347

LEVEL 1

1,199

8%

LEVEL 2

3,229

23%

LEVEL 3

5,439

38%

LEVEL 4

4,480

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,445
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,459

LEVEL 1

1,037

7%

LEVEL 2

2,977

21%

LEVEL 3

5,153

36%

LEVEL 4

5,292

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

363

50%

LEVEL 2

264

37%

LEVEL 3

84

12%

LEVEL 4

9

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 716

LEVEL 1

333

47%

LEVEL 2

285

40%

LEVEL 3

86

12%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,336
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,595

LEVEL 1

565

6%

LEVEL 2

1,694

18%

LEVEL 3

3,730

39%

LEVEL 4

3,606

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,887
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,010

LEVEL 1

482

5%

LEVEL 2

1,641

16%

LEVEL 3

3,632

36%

LEVEL 4

4,255

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,676
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,472

LEVEL 1

997

18%

LEVEL 2

1,799

33%

LEVEL 3

1,793

33%

LEVEL 4

883

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,656
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,165

LEVEL 1

888

17%

LEVEL 2

1,621

31%

LEVEL 3

1,607

31%

LEVEL 4

1,049

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.