ABBEY LANE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

59

41%

LEVEL 4

28

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

48

38%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

24

43%

LEVEL 4

16

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

27

44%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

35

40%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

28

43%

LEVEL 4

15

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

25

42%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

18

39%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

57

45%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

47

39%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

59

43%

LEVEL 4

28

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

46

44%

LEVEL 4

25

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

43

40%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.