Skip to Content
Main content

WILBUR H LYNCH LITERACY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

235

59%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

35

9%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

246

48%

LEVEL 2

189

37%

LEVEL 3

58

11%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

91

52%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

92

40%

LEVEL 2

98

43%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

144

65%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

154

55%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

86

46%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

82

36%

LEVEL 2

101

44%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

18

53%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

127

71%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

138

61%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

178

53%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

175

42%

LEVEL 2

173

41%

LEVEL 3

53

13%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

57

90%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

71

77%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

76
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

217

45%

LEVEL 2

187

39%

LEVEL 3

58

12%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

29

94%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

82

46%

LEVEL 2

70

39%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

153

69%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

183

56%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.