Skip to Content
Main content

BEAVER RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

144

41%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

134

39%

LEVEL 3

110

32%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

72

44%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

82

47%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

75

22%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

126

43%

LEVEL 3

102

34%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

104

36%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

31

61%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

22

40%

LEVEL 2

27

49%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.