Skip to Content
Main content

CARTHAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 762

LEVEL 1

240

31%

LEVEL 2

276

36%

LEVEL 3

156

20%

LEVEL 4

90

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 784

LEVEL 1

193

25%

LEVEL 2

334

43%

LEVEL 3

183

23%

LEVEL 4

74

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

102

27%

LEVEL 2

131

35%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

163

42%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

138

36%

LEVEL 2

145

38%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

120

30%

LEVEL 2

171

43%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

16

24%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

22

39%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

179

33%

LEVEL 2

190

35%

LEVEL 3

111

20%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

152

26%

LEVEL 2

258

44%

LEVEL 3

123

21%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

24

44%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

11

30%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

33

42%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

111

17%

LEVEL 2

302

45%

LEVEL 3

180

27%

LEVEL 4

73

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

82

69%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

82

21%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

172

42%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

158

44%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

133

36%

LEVEL 2

162

44%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.