Skip to Content
Main content

BROADALBIN-PERTH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

147

25%

LEVEL 2

227

38%

LEVEL 3

160

27%

LEVEL 4

61

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

167

28%

LEVEL 2

210

35%

LEVEL 3

166

28%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

107

34%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

141

25%

LEVEL 2

217

38%

LEVEL 3

152

27%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

159

28%

LEVEL 2

203

35%

LEVEL 3

157

27%

LEVEL 4

54

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

105

20%

LEVEL 2

212

40%

LEVEL 3

158

29%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

122

22%

LEVEL 2

200

37%

LEVEL 3

165

30%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

42

71%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

45

79%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

124

37%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

118

35%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

94

37%

LEVEL 2

112

44%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

109

41%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.