GLOVERSVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

173

55%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

32

10%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

149

47%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

73

53%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

67

44%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

100

56%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

82

50%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

153

55%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

133

48%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

98

43%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

96

39%

LEVEL 2

98

40%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

75

85%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

53

78%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

27

36%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

43

37%

LEVEL 2

44

38%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

146

61%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

106

53%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.