Skip to Content
Main content

LANCASTER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

141

37%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

78

38%

LEVEL 4

47

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

73

45%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

69

18%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

196
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

129

38%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

131

36%

LEVEL 4

67

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

139

41%

LEVEL 4

69

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

36

65%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

22

52%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

118

35%

LEVEL 4

63

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

124

39%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

24

30%

LEVEL 2

37

47%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.