Skip to Content
Main content

FRONTIER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

80

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

137

31%

LEVEL 3

117

27%

LEVEL 4

123

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

66

38%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

66

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

77

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

108

28%

LEVEL 4

115

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

126

39%

LEVEL 4

80

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

122

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

22

49%

LEVEL 2

22

49%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

26

46%

LEVEL 2

27

48%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

68

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

101

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

46

42%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.