CLARENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

466
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

86

11%

LEVEL 2

218

28%

LEVEL 3

252

33%

LEVEL 4

214

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

439
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 737

LEVEL 1

77

10%

LEVEL 2

221

30%

LEVEL 3

241

33%

LEVEL 4

198

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

247
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

118

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

248
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

94

26%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

127

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

219
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

122

30%

LEVEL 3

123

30%

LEVEL 4

96

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

191
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

16

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

18

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

416
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 689

LEVEL 1

76

11%

LEVEL 2

197

29%

LEVEL 3

226

33%

LEVEL 4

190

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

388
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 659

LEVEL 1

65

10%

LEVEL 2

206

31%

LEVEL 3

217

33%

LEVEL 4

171

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

460
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

37

5%

LEVEL 2

196

28%

LEVEL 3

247

36%

LEVEL 4

213

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

430
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

41

6%

LEVEL 2

191

29%

LEVEL 3

233

35%

LEVEL 4

197

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

49

64%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

36

48%

LEVEL 2

30

40%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

433
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

67

10%

LEVEL 2

195

28%

LEVEL 3

233

34%

LEVEL 4

200

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

407
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 657

LEVEL 1

55

8%

LEVEL 2

195

30%

LEVEL 3

224

34%

LEVEL 4

183

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

14

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

22

28%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.