Skip to Content
Main content

LORRAINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

164

49%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

149

41%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

85

49%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

61

36%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

79

49%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

88

46%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

59

41%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

73

60%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

68

50%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

22

54%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

23

42%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

104

40%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

88

33%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

60

80%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

61

67%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

31

45%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

24

30%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

145

55%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

125

45%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.