Skip to Content
Main content

SMALLWOOD DRIVE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

103

39%

LEVEL 4

59

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

130

44%

LEVEL 4

67

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

47

39%

LEVEL 4

33

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

61

42%

LEVEL 4

46

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

69

46%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

51

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

107

45%

LEVEL 4

57

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

102

42%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

126

46%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

13

62%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

88

42%

LEVEL 4

52

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

113

47%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.