Skip to Content
Main content

PINE PLAINS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

65

29%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

35

34%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

48

39%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

60

38%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

98

42%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

30

86%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

37

76%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

36

41%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

99
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

76

27%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.