HOMER INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

126

36%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

119

33%

LEVEL 2

140

39%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

62

34%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

87

43%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

74

46%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

70

44%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

115

35%

LEVEL 2

132

41%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

108

32%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

105

33%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

84

26%

LEVEL 2

137

42%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

21

91%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

35

92%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

103
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

116

32%

LEVEL 2

138

39%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

79

42%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

82

53%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

84

49%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.