Skip to Content
Main content

NORTHEASTERN CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

86

26%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

145

42%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

76

23%

LEVEL 2

139

42%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

115

41%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

125

43%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

35

69%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

36

60%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

66

41%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

79

42%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.