Skip to Content
Main content

BEEKMANTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

178

33%

LEVEL 2

211

39%

LEVEL 3

123

23%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

212

35%

LEVEL 2

223

37%

LEVEL 3

124

21%

LEVEL 4

44

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

73

26%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

104

37%

LEVEL 2

120

42%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

139

43%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

171

33%

LEVEL 2

202

39%

LEVEL 3

119

23%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

201

35%

LEVEL 2

213

37%

LEVEL 3

120

21%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

112

24%

LEVEL 2

200

43%

LEVEL 3

121

26%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

137

27%

LEVEL 2

208

41%

LEVEL 3

124

24%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

66

84%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

75

83%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

71

25%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

125

42%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

141

44%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.