HORSEHEADS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

143

29%

LEVEL 2

160

33%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

114

24%

LEVEL 2

193

41%

LEVEL 3

90

19%

LEVEL 4

76

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

80

35%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

96

42%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

134

30%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

107

24%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

101

25%

LEVEL 2

166

41%

LEVEL 3

75

18%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

92

21%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

113

26%

LEVEL 4

73

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

79

19%

LEVEL 2

177

42%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

51

89%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

35

67%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

63

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

77

44%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

73

42%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.