HENDY AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

181

39%

LEVEL 2

147

32%

LEVEL 3

96

21%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

201

44%

LEVEL 2

154

34%

LEVEL 3

63

14%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

94

41%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

103

42%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

107

47%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

26

57%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

31

48%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

114

34%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

132

42%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

36

49%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

35

57%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

136

33%

LEVEL 2

141

34%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

145

38%

LEVEL 2

142

37%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

45

88%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

56

79%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

55

39%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

144

49%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

169

54%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.